Author summary
89% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Gazette Editorial Board results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,418 hits . Analysis detected 7,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,498 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,734 of 9,028 authors). This The Gazette Editorial Board is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. The Gazette Editorial Board
Author details
Total words: 6,498
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.8% 21.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst