Author summary
18%1 analyzed article/video469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Family results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,092 of 8,827 authors). This The Family is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
The Family
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
77%The Family (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,876
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Composition/Division: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos