Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Steve Walsh results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 261 hits . Analysis detected 1,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Steve Walsh is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Steve Walsh
Author details
Total words: 3,132
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst