NPR84%

The $13 billion carrier with a plumbing problem is home. Now come the costly repairs 26%

By Steve Walsh0%

6/4/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 899 faulty-reasoning hits from 783 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,341 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the article peer group.

With 4,600 sailors finally home, USS Gerald R. 
Ford will finally receive some much needed repairs and an upgrade to its beleaguered sewage system. 
The country's newest aircraft carrier undertook an eight-month maiden voyage in January 2024, swiftly followed by a nearly 11-month deployment. 
That is longer than any carrier had been away since the Vietnam War. 
It is expected to go into maintenance at Norfolk Naval Shipyard in Norfolk, Va. 
Crews will repair the damage caused by a fire that started in the laundry room in March and spread to the area where sailors sleep. 
At the same time, workers will also upgrade the ship's sewage system, said Rear Adm. 
Kavon Hakimzadeh, who oversees the shipyard. 
NPR has reported on numerous breakdowns that plagued the ship during the early months of its recent record-breaking long deployment. 
Originally contacted by a parent of a sailor on board the Ford about the sewage system issues, NPR later reviewed emails from a Freedom of Information Act request that showed how the hull technicians on the ship were struggling to keep it running. 
The emails between departments covered March to August 2025. 
The carrier left Norfolk on June 24, 2025, for a deployment that would go from Europe, to the Caribbean for the operation around Venezuela and then to Operation Epic Fury, which targeted Iran. 
But the plumbing problem isn't just a question of a plunger and some elbow grease. 
The system, used on cruise ships, uses smaller pipes and vacuum suction to flush the toilets. 
Known as Vacuum Collection, Holding, and Transfer (VCHT), it's unique to the new Ford-class aircraft carriers. 
A March 18 email to the crew from the master machinist's mate, who is responsible for the ship's intricate systems, explained that the most common problem was a hose on the back of the toilet that had been coming loose, causing the system to lose suction. 
"I can't be more clear. 
WE NEED YOUR HELP TO PREVENT OUR VCHT SYSTEM FROM GOING DOWN AND CREATING UNSANITARY CONDITIONS," the email says. 
Technicians in the ship's hull department, which handles maintenance, offered to hold training sessions for sailors in how to use the system. 
Sailors also found T-shirts and other articles of clothing, as well as a 4-foot piece of rope, according to an Aug. 26, 2025, memo. 
The carrier received increasing media attention as its deployment wore on, especially after a March 16 fire sidelined the carrier for a time during the attacks on Iran. 
The Navy has maintained that the USS Ford's systems operated within expected parameters with more than 4,000 personnel embarked. 
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. 
Daryl Caudle said the problems with the sewage system have been overblown when he was asked about the breakdowns during the Ford's homecoming in May. 
"The sanitation systems on board any ship, submarine, destroyer, cruiser, carrier, all have challenges," Caudle said. 
"It's not whether or not that happens, it is when it does. 
How do we attack it, fix it, get it back online? 
And the team on Ford is very good at that." 
Enlisting sailors' help 
Problems with the sewage system were known to the Navy before the carrier was finished being built. 
USS George H.W. 
Bush used a vacuum system; it sidelined the ship in 2011, before the Navy installed a fix to help isolate the problem. 
Emails reviewed by NPR also show hull technicians on the Ford were asking sailors to help find leaks among the hundreds of toilets. 
A loose valve in one area could potentially cause all of the toilets in that part of the ship to fail. 
One Ford officer explained what was happening in an Aug. 15 email, writing, "It's a closed system and thousands of components ship-wide that fail daily. 
With one commode control valve failure, depending on the location," all of the toilets in that area of the ship can be brought down, or even all of the toilets through the front or rear of the aircraft carrier. 
Now that the USS Ford is finally home, the shipyard will install the same fix used on the USS Bush. 
"Right now it's essentially in quarters, and the new system subdivides it significantly further, so that a problem in one bathroom doesn't cut off a quarter of the ship," Hakimzadeh said. 
The Government Accountability Office highlighted the problems in a 2020 report, including that the Ford requires an acid flush to keep its sewage systems clear, which costs $400,000 each time it's used. 
The flushes cannot be done while the ship is deployed, but it will happen now the Ford is back in Norfolk. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.2%Steve Walsh: 6.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic13.2%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.7%Steve Walsh: 1.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias4.7%This article: 3.2%Steve Walsh: 0.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias3.2%This article: 1.9%Steve Walsh: 4.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.7%Steve Walsh: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias4.7%This article: 2.6%Steve Walsh: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.6%This article: 4.0%Steve Walsh: 2.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.8%Steve Walsh: 8.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias15.8%This article: 3.2%Steve Walsh: 3.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Steve Walsh: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Steve Walsh: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias6.1%This article: 1.0%Steve Walsh: 0.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.7%Steve Walsh: 6.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority13.7%This article: 3.4%Steve Walsh: 0.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 5.0%Steve Walsh: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope5.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.7%Steve Walsh: 2.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.4%Steve Walsh: 4.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion2.4%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.4%Steve Walsh: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.4%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.6%Steve Walsh: 2.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal8.6%This article: 2.0%Steve Walsh: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman2.0%This article: 1.9%Steve Walsh: 0.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.0%Steve Walsh: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading4.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.1%Steve Walsh: 1.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 1.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Walsh: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

783 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers21%attributed speech621writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKavon Hakimzadeh • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Navy • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDaryl Caudle • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDaryl Caudle • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDaryl Caudle • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDaryl Caudle • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDaryl Caudle • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKavon Hakimzadeh • 31 words • 0.0% coverageGovernment Accountability Office • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kavon Hakimzadeh

84%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words23% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%Kavon Hakimzadeh: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.