Author summary
81%1 analyzed article/video675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve M. results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 2,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,591 of 8,795 authors). This Steve M. is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Steve M.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
71%Steve M. (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,700
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos