Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Stephen Prager results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 339 hits. Analysis detected 2,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,769 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,214 authors). This Stephen Prager is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stephen Prager
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Stephen Prager (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,769
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.6%5.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos