Author summary
6%1 analyzed article/video877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Rudig results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 493 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,631 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 54% (4,278 of 9,251 authors). This Stephanie Rudig is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Stephanie Rudig
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
54%Stephanie Rudig (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,631
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 7.0%7.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate