Author summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophia Schmidt results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Special Pleading, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 222 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (6,147 of 8,876 authors). This Sophia Schmidt is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Sophia Schmidt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠31%Sophia Schmidt (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,864
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos