Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Skyler Ware results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 898 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,010 of 6,244 authors). This Skyler Ware is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Skyler Ware
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
52%Skyler Ware (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,232
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 18.4%18.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.3%2.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 18.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos