Author summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Signal Ohio results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 776 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (8,274 of 8,882 authors). This Signal Ohio is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Signal Ohio
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠7%Signal Ohio (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,056
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos