Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shawn Paik results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 1,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,116 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,238 of 6,628 authors). This Shawn Paik is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Shawn Paik
Author details
Total words: 1,116
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.9% 7.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst