Author summary
31%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shauna Muckle results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Ad Hominem, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 1,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,403 of 8,932 authors). This Shauna Muckle is worse (more manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Shauna Muckle
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
85%Shauna Muckle (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,344
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.3% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 12.2%12.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Tu Quoque: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos