Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sasha Chanoff results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 324 hits . Analysis detected 2,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,823 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,348 authors). This Sasha Chanoff is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sasha Chanoff
Author details
Total words: 2,823
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst