Author summary
35% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Vogelsong results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 585 hits . Analysis detected 5,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,366 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,481 of 8,841 authors). This Sarah Vogelsong is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group. Sarah Vogelsong
Author details
Total words: 11,366
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst