Author summary
67%1 analyzed article/video328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Mueller results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 912 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (2,357 of 8,876 authors). This Sarah Mueller is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Sarah Mueller
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
74%Sarah Mueller (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,312
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.9%14.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.7%3.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.7%2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos