Author summary
ā 68% 1 analyzed article/video 594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Harwell results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ā 66% (3,107 of 9,089 authors). This Sarah Harwell is worse (more manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. Sarah Harwell
Author details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst