Author summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Custer results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 1,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,704 of 9,073 authors). This Sara Custer is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Sara Custer
Author details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst