Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Byford results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 318 hits . Analysis detected 1,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 904 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.5% and a BS Rank of 96% (277 of 6,628 authors). This Sam Byford is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Sam Byford
Author details
Total words: 904
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.8% percentile 11.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles904 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 35.2% 35.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.3% 17.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.6% 25.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.5% 5.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 35.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 27.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.6%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 17.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst