'RikuRyu' signs off in emotional farewell ⁠100%

By Sam Byford⁠0%

4/28/2026, 6:19:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 304 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (64 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the article peer group.

Riku Miura and Ryuichi Kihara, the popular Olympic and world champion figure skating pair known as “RikuRyu,” paid tribute to fans and each other on Tuesday to mark their retirement from competition. 
In an emotional, often tearful news conference in Tokyo packed with reporters, the pair emphasized that their decision to retire was the planned conclusion of one chapter of their story together. 
The decision had effectively been made before the season began, according to Miura — though they considered changing their minds after an early slipup at the Milano Cortina Olympics in February. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 31.0%Sam Byford: 3.4%The Japan Times: 3.5%Confirmation Bias31.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 5.1%The Japan Times: 4.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 9.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 37.0%Sam Byford: 27.8%The Japan Times: 14.4%Framing Effect37.0%This article: 31.0%Sam Byford: 3.4%The Japan Times: 0.9%Loss Aversion31.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 3.1%The Japan Times: 4.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 3.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 37.0%Sam Byford: 25.6%The Japan Times: 11.6%Negativity Bias37.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 4.2%The Japan Times: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 32.0%Sam Byford: 17.3%The Japan Times: 1.5%Halo Effect32.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.9%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 5.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 31.0%Sam Byford: 15.2%The Japan Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion31.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 31.0%Sam Byford: 5.5%The Japan Times: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)31.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 31.0%Sam Byford: 5.5%The Japan Times: 4.6%Unattributed Quote31.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 37.0%Sam Byford: 35.2%The Japan Times: 9.0%Biased Writer Voice37.0%This article: 6.0%Sam Byford: 0.7%The Japan Times: 1.6%Indoctrination6.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sam Byford: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

100 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker31%attributed speech69writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageRiku Miura • 31 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Riku Miura

100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Riku Miura: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-53.6 ptsWriter: 53.6%Riku Miura: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.7 ptsWriter: 8.7%Riku Miura: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.