Author summary
2%1 analyzed article/video3,379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sahan Journal results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 1,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (8,795 of 8,826 authors). This Sahan Journal is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Sahan Journal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
1%Sahan Journal (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,516
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.4% percentile
0.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos