Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roman Mars results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 787 hits. Analysis detected 3,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (1,044 of 6,628 authors). This Roman Mars is worse (more manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Roman Mars
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠85%Roman Mars (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,896
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 27.2%27.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 25.8%25.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 27.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos