Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roger Sands results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 3,780 hits. Analysis detected 11,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,364 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,042 of 6,628 authors). This Roger Sands is worse (more manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Roger Sands
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
85%Roger Sands (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,364
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 51.3%51.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.2%18.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 16.7%16.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 51.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 16.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos