Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roger Koopman results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 37.3% saturation with 1,160 hits. Analysis detected 8,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (784 of 6,628 authors). This Roger Koopman is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Roger Koopman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠89%Roger Koopman (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,112
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 37.3%37.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 29.1%29.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.5%18.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 17.3%17.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.8%8.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 37.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 29.1%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 16.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Author 8.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos