Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 900 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riyadh results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 640 hits . Analysis detected 4,665 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,064 of 6,164 authors). This Riyadh is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Riyadh
Author details
Total words: 3,600
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst