Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Richard A. Greenwald results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 1,822 hits . Analysis detected 8,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Richard A. Greenwald is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Richard A. Greenwald
Author details
Total words: 9,060
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst