Author summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RedState Guest Editorial results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 736 hits . Analysis detected 6,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,238 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,132 of 6,629 authors). This RedState Guest Editorial is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. RedState Guest Editorial
Author details
Total words: 5,238
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.1% 14.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst