RedState91%

FORMER TRUMP FBI OFFICIAL: China's Missile Test Is a Wake-Up Call - Congress Must Not Blow the Response - RedState 59%

By RedState Guest Editorial82%

7/12/2026, 6:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.6% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 2,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 973 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.1% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,135 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the article peer group.

Monday morning, before most Americans had finished their breakfast, a Chinese nuclear submarine surfaced in the Pacific and fired a ballistic missile carrying a dummy warhead. 
This was Beijing's first test of its kind since 2024. 
Japan scrambled to track falling debris. 
Australia and New Zealand issued formal protests. 
This was a message, sent deliberately, to an American public still debating whether the China threat is real. 
It is real. 
And it didn't start Monday. 
Days earlier, the Pentagon's annual report on the People's Liberation Army landed with a warning too many in Washington will ignore: Beijing is on pace to field nine aircraft carriers by 2035, its nuclear arsenal is projected to blow past 1,000 warheads by 2030, and Xi Jinping has directed his military to be ready to seize Taiwan by 2027. 
The report also detailed something Americans should find chilling closer to home  the Volt Typhoon cyber intrusions that burrowed into U.S. critical infrastructure, to be ready, in a crisis, to shut off our own lights, water, and pipelines. 
Add to that the reporting this month that Chinese personnel have been training Russian forces in radiological, biological, and chemical warfare on the battlefield in Ukraine, and the picture is unmistakable. 
Beijing and Moscow are partners. 
Exchanging real operational lessons, in real time, against a backdrop of the worst land war in Europe since 1945. 
When I served as an official with the Trump administration, I saw the aftermath of threats that metastasize when warning signs sat too long without a real response. 
Beijing is moving on every front  military, cyber, industrial  and Congress is right to want tools that match that scale. 
The AI competition is no exception: whoever's technology the world builds on will hold the advantage for a generation. 
That's precisely why it matters that the tools we pass actually work. 
RELATED: Pentagon Cuts Big Tech AI Deals - and the Future of War Just Changed 
The Chinese Robots Are Already Here - Congress Is Finally Responding 
Right now, a coalition on Capitol Hill is pushing to fold half a dozen AI chip export bills into next year's defense bill, betting that bundling them together is the surest way to get something signed into law. 
That instinct is right. 
Beijing isn't waiting around, and neither should we. 
But bundling works only if every bill in the package actually holds up  not just the ones with the toughest-sounding titles. 
One bill moving through the Senate right now, the Remote Access Security Act , is a good test case. 
The problem it claims to fix is real  Beijing finding backdoor ways around our chip export bans. 
But RASA goes way further than that. 
It doesn't just target chips or AI  it's written so broadly that it could sweep up huge swaths of ordinary cloud business with allies like the UK and Germany, not just China. 
The result is American companies getting told to walk away from big chunks of the world market. 
And that's exactly the kind of own-goal China wants. 
Wall off American cloud and AI companies from the rest of the world, and you clear the field for Huawei and other Chinese providers to take those customers. 
Winning the AI race requires us to build the best chips. 
But it’s also about whose technology the rest of the world runs on. 
RASA doesn't protect that lead. 
It hands it away. 
The lesson from this week's missile test is an urgent one. 
But more bills with "China" in the title is not enough. 
We need the bills we pass to address the actual problem  chip smuggling, cyber intrusions into infrastructure, technology transfer to the PLA  not broad grants of regulatory discretion that outlast this threat and this administration alike. 
Beijing is not waiting for Congress to get its act together. 
It is testing missiles, training alongside Russian forces, and building the capacity to take Taiwan by force. 
American resolve has to be matched by American precision. 
Anything less is a misguided distraction  and those types of empty gestures have never stopped a submarine. 
Gayle Trotter (@GayleTrotter) is an attorney and conservative commentator. 
She is a former Special Counsel to Federal Bureau of Investigation Deputy Director Dan Bongino and hosts The Gayle Trotter Show: RIGHT in DC podcast. 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy RedState's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Watch: Bison Hurls Man 8 Feet High in Yellowstone Campground 
Breaking: Swift Response From U.S. 
Military After IRGC Strikes Container Ship and Closes Strait of Hormuz 
NYC Mayor Plays the Fool After State Dept. 
Shut Down Mamdani Official's Meeting With Iranian Ambassador 
Senator Lindsey Graham Passes Away at Age 71 
Russia Closes Key Maritime Routes to Civilian Traffic Due to Ukrainian Drone Offensive Hitting 78 Ships 
After Imploding on Platner, Ro Khanna Claims He Was 'Detained' by Israeli Settlers in West Bank 
Trending on RedState Videos 
If Only Democrats Had Some Sign of Platner's Dubious Character 
THE ESSEX FILES: Low-Flying Patriots Deserve Cheers, Not Bureaucratic Witch Hunts 
Susan Collins Is Leaving Nothing to Chance - but Can She Ward Off Another Shutdown Before Midterms? 
Jennifer Oliver O'Connell 
DOJ Subpoenas NYT Reporters in Leak Investigation After Air Force One Story, Iran Assassination Plot 
TRENDING ON TOWNHALL MEDIA 
Did NBC News Reveal the Cause of Death for Sen. 
Lindsey Graham? 
'What's Happening on the Ground' Post Sheds Some Light on Lindsey Graham's Possible Cause of Death 
Praise Be to Allah, Trump Finds a New Way to Enrage Leftists and Jihad Enablers 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%RedState Guest Editorial: 9.0%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 3.1%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%RedState Guest Editorial: 2.8%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic15.1%This article: 3.4%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.1%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.4%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%RedState Guest Editorial: 2.9%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias3.1%This article: 3.9%RedState Guest Editorial: 5.3%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect3.9%This article: 2.2%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.7%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion2.2%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.9%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.2%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%RedState Guest Editorial: 3.3%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 34.6%RedState Guest Editorial: 14.1%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias34.6%This article: 2.9%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.5%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 3.9%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.0%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error3.9%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.7%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.3%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.9%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.6%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.6%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias6.5%This article: 1.6%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.4%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem2.0%This article: 1.1%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.2%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man1.1%This article: 13.4%RedState Guest Editorial: 9.4%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority13.4%This article: 9.2%RedState Guest Editorial: 2.0%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma9.2%This article: 2.9%RedState Guest Editorial: 3.5%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.5%RedState Guest Editorial: 7.9%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization14.5%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.4%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.2%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.2%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon1.2%This article: 16.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 8.3%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion16.0%This article: 10.6%RedState Guest Editorial: 2.4%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question10.6%This article: 5.8%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.6%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.3%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.7%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.3%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.3%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.6%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division1.3%This article: 2.9%RedState Guest Editorial: 2.1%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal2.9%This article: 1.8%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman1.8%This article: 1.4%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.2%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.4%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.6%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.4%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.4%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 2.2%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.1%RedState Guest Editorial: 1.8%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.1%This article: 28.2%RedState Guest Editorial: 4.4%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice28.2%This article: 5.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 4.4%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination5.0%This article: 0.0%RedState Guest Editorial: 0.0%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%RedState Guest Editorial: 8.5%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias8.6%This article: 2.8%RedState Guest Editorial: 2.4%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.8%

973 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers2.3%attributed speech951writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 59 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRedState VIP • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRedState • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTownhall Media • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

RedState VIP

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words64% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +98.6 ptsWriter: 1.4%RedState VIP: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.8 ptsWriter: 28.8%RedState VIP: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -8.8 ptsWriter: 8.8%RedState VIP: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%RedState VIP: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%RedState VIP: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.