Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,106 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca F. Elliott results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 601 hits . Analysis detected 3,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,424 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,449 of 6,628 authors). This Rebecca F. Elliott is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Rebecca F. Elliott
Author details
Total words: 4,424
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst