Author summary
3% 1 analyzed article/video 440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phillip Pantuso results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 90 hits . Analysis detected 657 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,615 of 9,043 authors). This Phillip Pantuso is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Phillip Pantuso
Author details
Total words: 1,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Composition/Division: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst