Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Peter Alexander results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 762 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,789 authors). This Peter Alexander is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Peter Alexander
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Peter Alexander (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,100
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos