Author summary
4%2 analyzed articles/videos209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peggy Santoro results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Recency Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 836 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,116 of 8,877 authors). This Peggy Santoro is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Peggy Santoro
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
65%Peggy Santoro (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 836
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles836 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate