Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Tassi results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 631 hits . Analysis detected 2,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,561 of 6,628 authors). This Paul Tassi is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Paul Tassi
Author details
Total words: 2,652
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.8% 23.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst