Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pat Hickey results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 857 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,868 authors). This Pat Hickey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Pat Hickey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Pat Hickey (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,488
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 28.4%28.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Author 28.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos