Author summary
79%4 analyzed articles/videos736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pam Key results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 4,322 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,384 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,443 of 6,382 authors). This Pam Key is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Pam Key
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
62%Pam Key (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,384
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.2%6.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate