Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paige Lavender results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 808 hits . Analysis detected 4,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (859 of 6,184 authors). This Paige Lavender is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. Paige Lavender
Author details
Total words: 2,656
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.1% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 30.4% 30.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.2% 0.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 7.6% 7.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.6% 20.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 20.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 9.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Red Herring: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst