Author summary
20% 3 analyzed articles/videos 384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Omaha Documenters results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 148 hits . Analysis detected 815 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,968 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 57% (3,981 of 9,075 authors). This Omaha Documenters is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Omaha Documenters
Author details
Total words: 1,968
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst