Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Olivia Comolli results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 94 hits . Analysis detected 364 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,066 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,095 authors). This Olivia Comolli is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Olivia Comolli
Author details
Total words: 2,066
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst