Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Bernstein results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 546 hits. Analysis detected 2,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (531 of 6,628 authors). This Noah Bernstein is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Noah Bernstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
92%Noah Bernstein (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,244
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 43.9%43.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 17.0%17.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 15.0%15.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 37.4%37.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 43.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 37.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 18.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 15.0%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos