Author summary
21%1 analyzed article/video1,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nitya Nadgir results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 2,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,838 of 9,024 authors). This Nitya Nadgir is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Nitya Nadgir
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
14%Nitya Nadgir (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,240
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos