Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Niniek Karmini results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 1,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,466 of 6,359 authors). This Niniek Karmini is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Niniek Karmini
Author details
Total words: 2,732
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.7% 10.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.9% 8.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst