AP News53%

Explosion of invasive 'janitor fish' sparks mass removal operation in Indonesia's capital 19%

By Niniek Karmini0%

4/24/2026, 8:14:36 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 1,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 683 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,871 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the article peer group.

JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP)  Cheers broke out in Indonesia’s capital on Friday as residents, city workers and environmental volunteers hauled bulging nets of invasive fish to the surface of a reservoir in an operation to crack down on “janitor fish.” 
Authorities are seeking to remove at least 10 tons (9 metric tons) of the fish from Jakarta’s waterways, an effort officials hope will restore balance to the Ciliwung River and renew public attention on water quality. 
From the polluted river to the concrete embankments and skyscraper-lined canals of the city’s heart, the dark shapes of the fish cling tightly to the river walls. 
At first glance, they appear almost prehistoric, with armored bodies gleaming a dull brown beneath the murky surface. 
Janitor fish, or suckermouth catfish, known scientifically as Pterygoplichthys and locally as “sapu-sapu,” aren’t native to Indonesia. 
Imported decades ago for aquariums because of their ability to consume algae, they were later released and found a home in Jakarta’s heavily polluted rivers. 
The fish can grow up to 50 centimeters (nearly 20 inches) and live for 10-15 years. 
Dian Rosleine, an ecologist from the Bandung Institute of Technology, said that the adaptability of janitor fish is very high, so that even in polluted conditions, it can survive when other species can’t. 
“The Ciliwung River requires rehabilitation, our major challenge that must be addressed,” Rosleine said. 
“Addressing the symptoms without tackling the root causes will not provide a lasting solution.” 
The Ciliwung once carried clear water from the mountains of West Java into Jakarta. 
Today, it flows through dense neighborhoods, carrying untreated household waste and industrial runoff. 
Concrete walls replaced riverbanks. 
During dry months, the water warms and slows  conditions that favor janitor fish over native species, Rosleine said. 
Jakarta authorities have responded with mass removals, targeting the janitor fish in city waterways. 
The campaign began last week. 
The cleanup drive, ordered by Jakarta Gov. 
Pramono Anung, was carried out simultaneously in all five administrative cities of the capital, involving hundreds of personnel, including firefighters, disaster officers and local residents. 
They have netted and buried more than seven tons of janitor fish across the city within a week. 
The cleanup on Friday at a 6-meter-deep (19-foot-deep) reservoir in East Jakarta’s Ciracas neighborhood drew curious crowds as city workers collected about 320 kilograms (705 pounds) of the fish. 
Piles of wriggling janitor fish filled red barrels along the reservoir  tangible proof that something, at last, was being done. 
“The janitor fish populations have reproduced at a notable level while also feeding on native species,” East Jakarta’s mayor, Munjirin, told reporters when visiting Friday’s cleanup. 
“The impact extends beyond ecosystem destruction, contributing to structural damage to riverbank and embankment walls.” 
Munjirin, who like many Indonesians uses a single name, said that the coordinated operation marks the beginning of a sustained effort to control the species, with regular monitoring and removal planned to prevent further ecological damage. 
However, he vowed a review of the program’s method after the Indonesian Ulema Council, or MUI, raised concerns over perceived cruelty, pledging that all fish will be dead before burial. 
While endorsing the cleanup, MUI’s fatwa commission warned that burying the janitor fish alive amounts to a violation of animal rights enshrined in Islamic teaching. 
Authorities are still cautious about what happens next. 
As janitor fish are edible in some countries, concerns over heavy metal contamination mean they won’t be immediately approved for consumption in Jakarta. 
Instead, officials are exploring alternatives, including processing the fish into animal feed or fertilizer. 
Anung said that the cleanup method will require the fish to be dead before burial at designated sites, with hygiene standards applied to block their return to rivers or trade. 
The Jakarta governor noted that buried janitor fish can serve as natural compost and suggested adopting Brazil’s model, where the fish are turned into charcoal to generate greater economic benefits. 
Yet experts caution that removal is only a beginning. 
Without improving wastewater management and reducing pollution, the river could quickly return to the same condition. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.4%Niniek Karmini: 1.6%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Niniek Karmini: 2.0%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.7%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Niniek Karmini: 11.4%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect8.2%This article: 3.4%Niniek Karmini: 0.8%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion3.4%This article: 3.1%Niniek Karmini: 0.8%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.7%Niniek Karmini: 10.7%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias15.7%This article: 3.5%Niniek Karmini: 2.1%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias3.5%This article: 13.9%Niniek Karmini: 5.4%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias13.9%This article: 4.4%Niniek Karmini: 1.1%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Niniek Karmini: 1.0%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 23.9%Niniek Karmini: 8.9%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority23.9%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 4.4%Niniek Karmini: 1.1%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope4.4%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.6%Niniek Karmini: 1.9%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization2.6%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.4%Niniek Karmini: 6.6%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion23.4%This article: 2.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.5%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 8.2%Niniek Karmini: 2.0%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.2%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.3%Niniek Karmini: 1.3%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof5.3%This article: 3.4%Niniek Karmini: 1.9%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.4%This article: 4.4%Niniek Karmini: 1.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division4.4%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.8%Niniek Karmini: 1.0%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote3.8%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 15.5%Niniek Karmini: 5.1%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice15.5%This article: 3.7%Niniek Karmini: 2.0%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination3.7%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Niniek Karmini: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

683 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers35%attributed speech441writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDian Rosleine • 33 words • 0.0% coverageDian Rosleine • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDian Rosleine • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDian Rosleine • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageMunjirin • 26 words • 100.0% coverageMunjirin • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMunjirin • 36 words • 0.0% coverageMunjirin • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMUI’s fatwa commission • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnung • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
25 attributed words10% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%MUI’s fatwa commission: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.0 ptsWriter: 24.0%MUI’s fatwa commission: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.