Author summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Broderick results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 366 hits . Analysis detected 1,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,927 of 9,405 authors). This Nina Broderick is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Nina Broderick
Author details
Total words: 3,844
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst