Author summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Yang results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Representativeness Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 1,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,761 of 6,341 authors). This Nicole Yang is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Nicole Yang
Author details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst