Patriots training camp: Five position battles to watch 31%

By Nicole Yang53%

7/23/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Representativeness Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 922 faulty-reasoning hits from 952 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,149 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the article peer group.

The Patriots will host their first training camp practice on Saturday, marking the start of an important six-week stretch. 
With several players vying for spots on the 53-man roster, which will be finalized Aug. 30, let’s take a look at some of the projected positional battles to watch ... 
Wide receiver depth 
The Patriots this offseason made significant upgrades at receiver, trading for A.J. 
Brown and signing Romeo Doubs. 
Those moves instantly elevated New England’s passing attack, supplying quarterback Drake Maye with two talented targets. 
So, where does that leave the rest of the room? 
Mack Hollins should be a roster lock. 
He played 60 percent of the offensive snaps last season, leading all receivers. 
He has familiarity with offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels, posting the best numbers of his career when playing in his system. 
His size (6 feet 4 inches, 221 pounds) allows him to play with physicality, both when blocking and making contested catches. 
Kayshon Boutte should also be a lock, given his previous production and strong rapport with Maye, but there is growing chatter he will be traded. 
Boutte, who is entering the final year of his rookie contract, has some overlap with Brown’s skill set, so it’s unsurprising if he prefers to play elsewhere ahead of a critical negotiation period. 
But will the Patriots be able to find a trade partner offering an acceptable return? 
If Boutte ends up staying, there will be seven receivers jockeying for five or six spots. 
Kayshon Boutte has built a good rapport with Drake Maye, but is on the final year of his rookie contract and could be a trade candidate. 
Kyle Williams will stick around. 
His rookie year didn’t result in eye-popping numbers, just 10 receptions for 209 yards and three touchdowns, but the coaching staff has expressed optimism for his second season. 
Coach Mike Vrabel said Williams has upped his strength, something executive vice president of player personnel Eliot Wolf also listed as a key area of focus to complement his speed. 
DeMario Douglas and Efton Chism are on the bubble. 
Douglas, whose production and playing time dropped last year, could see an uptick in snaps out of the slot now that Stefon Diggs is gone. 
Chism, last year’s training camp darling, played just 8.4 percent of the offensive snaps. 
Unlike Douglas, Chism has contributed on special teams. 
Second tight end 
With Julian Hill out for the season, the Patriots will need to find an inline tight end. 
Hunter Henry functions best as a pass catcher, so there will be an opportunity for third-round pick Eli Raridon, undrafted rookie Tanner Arkin, Mitch Van Vooren (signed Wednesday), Jack Westover, or CJ Dippre. 
All four are young and inexperienced, so it makes sense that Vrabel indicated in June that the team would consider adding another player at the position. 
Available names include Pharaoh Brown, Will Dissly, Tucker Fisk, and Jonnu Smith. 
If the Patriots elect not to bring in a veteran, Raridon could experience an expedited development. 
There also is a path for Arkin (6-4, 262) to make the roster, given his measurables and well-documented run-blocking ability in college. 
Westover and Dippre will have their chances, too, even though Westover primarily played fullback last season and Dippre is opening camp on the physically unable to perform list. 
Regardless of how the competition shakes out, the Patriots may end up relying more on Hollins as a blocker and/or on jumbo packages with a sixth offensive lineman. 
Third running back 
The tandem of Rhamondre Stevenson and TreVeyon Henderson is set to lead the backfield, but the Patriots will need another body to round out the rotation. 
Terrell Jennings, Lan Larison, seventh-round pick Jam Miller, and undrafted rookie Myles Montgomery are in the mix. 
Jennings, who is starting camp on PUP, is the only option with NFL experience, logging 73 yards and a touchdown on 23 carries last season. 
But he did not wow to the point that he is the favorite for the job. 
Larison popped at points last summer before landing on injured reserve with a broken foot. 
He would be a compelling addition because of his ability to contribute in the passing game. 
He caught 62 passes for 847 yards and six touchdowns, while rushing for 1,465 yards and 17 touchdowns, as a senior at UC Davis in 2024. 
Miller isn’t as proven as a receiver but boasts special teams prowess. 
By the end of his freshman year at Alabama, he was a member of all four units on special teams. 
Montgomery doesn’t have much experience in the passing game, either. 
Kickoff returner 
The Patriots are in need of a go-to kickoff returner after releasing Antonio Gibson. 
Given some of the players that will likely be competing for the job  Chism, Jennings, and Larison  this role could end up looming large in final roster cuts. 
Last season, Chism, Williams, and Henderson took significant reps as kickoff returners following Gibson’s season-ending injury in Week 5. 
If Henderson and Williams are going to experience increased workloads, the Patriots may not want them returning kickoffs, as well. 
Edge rusher 
Edge rusher was a top need headed into the offseason and remains one. 
There is excitement about the addition of Dre’Mont Jones and growth of Elijah Ponder, but veteran Harold Landry, who is opening camp on PUP, and second-round pick Gabe Jacas, who remains unsigned, did not participate in practice throughout the spring. 
If they continue to miss time, there will be an opportunity for 2025 fifth-round pick Bradyn Swinson, undrafted rookie Xavier Holmes, or Jesse Luketa to earn a spot in the rotation. 
Nicole Yang can be reached at nicole.yang@globe.com. 
Follow her on X @nicolecyang. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.8%Nicole Yang: 3.9%Boston Globe: 3.0%Confirmation Bias4.8%This article: 1.4%Nicole Yang: 1.3%Boston Globe: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.4%This article: 7.2%Nicole Yang: 2.4%Boston Globe: 3.3%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 8.0%Nicole Yang: 3.6%Boston Globe: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Nicole Yang: 2.6%Boston Globe: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 6.4%Nicole Yang: 2.1%Boston Globe: 5.2%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 1.5%Nicole Yang: 0.5%Boston Globe: 0.5%Loss Aversion1.5%This article: 2.7%Nicole Yang: 0.9%Boston Globe: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.9%Nicole Yang: 8.6%Boston Globe: 2.0%Optimism Bias11.9%This article: 3.8%Nicole Yang: 1.3%Boston Globe: 1.3%Pessimism Bias3.8%This article: 2.9%Nicole Yang: 1.0%Boston Globe: 7.9%Negativity Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Nicole Yang: 1.2%Boston Globe: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error3.5%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 2.2%Boston Globe: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Nicole Yang: 3.5%Boston Globe: 1.4%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.4%Nicole Yang: 3.5%Boston Globe: 3.8%Appeal to Authority7.4%This article: 3.3%Nicole Yang: 1.1%Boston Globe: 1.1%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 2.7%Nicole Yang: 0.9%Boston Globe: 0.5%Slippery Slope2.7%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.3%Nicole Yang: 1.9%Boston Globe: 2.8%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 5.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.4%Nicole Yang: 2.8%Boston Globe: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.4%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.7%Nicole Yang: 0.9%Boston Globe: 2.0%Anecdotal2.7%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.5%Nicole Yang: 1.2%Boston Globe: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.5%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.4%Nicole Yang: 3.3%Boston Globe: 2.1%Biased Writer Voice4.4%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nicole Yang: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

952 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.2%attributed speech922writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageEliot Wolf • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eliot Wolf

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words100% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Eliot Wolf: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.