Author summary
65% 2 analyzed articles/videos 961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Leonard results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 371 hits . Analysis detected 2,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,844 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,169 of 8,876 authors). This Nicole Leonard is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Nicole Leonard
Author details
Total words: 3,844
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst