Author summary
65%2 analyzed articles/videos961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Leonard results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 2,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,844 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,169 of 8,876 authors). This Nicole Leonard is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Nicole Leonard
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
42%Nicole Leonard (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,844
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510041.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.7%9.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate