Author summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nellie Andreeva results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Bandwagon , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 2,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,663 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,487 of 6,359 authors). This Nellie Andreeva is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Nellie Andreeva
Author details
Total words: 2,663
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.9%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst