Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathalie Tocci results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,387 hits. Analysis detected 13,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,144 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,694 of 6,215 authors). This Nathalie Tocci is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Nathalie Tocci
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
57%Nathalie Tocci (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,144
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.2%10.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate