Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathalie Tocci results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,387 hits . Analysis detected 13,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,144 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,694 of 6,215 authors). This Nathalie Tocci is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Nathalie Tocci
Author details
Total words: 11,144
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.2% 10.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst