Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mujtaba Rahman results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 1,329 hits. Analysis detected 9,067 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (2,269 of 6,244 authors). This Mujtaba Rahman is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Mujtaba Rahman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠64%Mujtaba Rahman (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,368
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510063.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 18.0%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos