Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nada Elia results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 483 hits. Analysis detected 1,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,337 authors). This Nada Elia is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nada Elia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Nada Elia (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 12.7%12.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 23.1%23.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.3%2.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 23.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos