Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mohammad Sartaj Alam results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 540 hits . Analysis detected 3,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Mohammad Sartaj Alam is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Mohammad Sartaj Alam
Author details
Total words: 4,400
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst